The Untold Truth Of Bird Box

The constant flow of Netflix original films and series can be overwhelming. Some are interesting, offbeat flicks like the Coen brothers' "The Ballad of Buster Scruggs," while others start out shaky and then find their footing, as we saw between the first and second seasons of "Iron Fist." But every once in a while, a film hits the Netflix home screen and immediately skyrockets off the charts, soaking up gobs of viewers and earning headlines in the process — like, for example, "Bird Box."

This thriller takes place in an apocalyptic world where mysterious creatures have upended human society. It captivated audiences not just with its eerie suspense, but also with solid acting from Sandra Bullock, who plays the film's protagonist, Malorie, along with a cast of excellent supporting talent including Trevante Rhodes and John Malkovich. The movie has caused a flurry of reactions, rumors, and reports, and the story behind the scenes has proven to be just as interesting. So let's shutter those windows, remove our blindfolds, and take a good long look at the film that caused so much hype over the 2018 holiday season. This is the untold truth of "Bird Box."

While it may feel like "Bird Box," by and large, felt like someone simply took "The Happening" and "A Quiet Place" and smooshed them together into a new film about birds and blindfolds, the director, Susanne Bier, has firmly confirmed that wasn't the case. "No, no, no," Bier told Polygon. "We were shooting [in April 2018] when we had heard of 'A Quiet Place,' and we were almost finished editing when it came out." The film actually found the basis for its story from the novel of the same name, published by Josh Malerman in 2014.

The fact that "Bird Box" was based on a story that predated Krasinski's 2018 smash hit thriller is comforting, as nothing takes the wind out of the sails of a good movie like knowing that it's a knockoff. The film's success with audiences also launched Malerman's novel into the top ranks of Amazon's "Most Sold" fiction books, even though it had never been on the list before the movie hit everyone's streaming queues.

Josh Malerman's book provided the inspiration for "Bird Box," but it's worth taking a moment to call out a few of the new wrinkles that were added to the story in the process of adapting it for the screen. For the most part, the movie follows the book fairly closely, with the same monsters, apocalypse, and struggle to get to the sanctuary at the end of the river. But there are a few significant changes, including one at the end of the film that was quickly called out more than once in the days following the movie's release.

It turns out that the end of the book was actually quite a bit darker than the uplifting end to the film. While Malorie, Boy, and Girl all reach the sanctuary at the end of the river, it doesn't turn out to be quite the paradise they were expecting, as the other survivors still continue to wear blindfolds or have even permanently blinded themselves as a precaution against the creatures. This subtle change from a deflated, discouraging end to a slightly more hopeful finale was explained by director Bier, who pointed out, "I'm not particularly interested for the audience to leave, from the cinema or their own screen, with a kind of completely bleak point of view."

One of the other larger deviations from the original text came in the form of some rather significant changes to a handful of the characters and their story arcs. For example, in the first act of the film, Malorie's sister Jessica, played by Sarah Paulson, is quickly whisked away after she sees a creature while driving Malorie home from the hospital. In the book, though, she survives along with her sister for a few months before falling victim to the monsters. Malorie's love interest Tom (Trevante Rhodes) was also altered, but in the opposite direction. Rather than surviving in the house and going on to raise Boy and Girl with Malorie, he falls victim to Gary while Malorie is busy delivering her baby.

And then there's Douglas, John Malkovich's character, who spouts the harshest and most utterly cold-blooded common sense in the film. While he ended up being a critical part of the movie, his character was non-existent in the book — although the novel's character Dom seems to fit the closest with Malkovich's Douglas.

The most mysterious element of the film is the creatures themselves. The creative minds behind the project were wise enough to never actually show them apart from a handful of disturbingly dark and dim drawings that Gary spread out on a coffee table. But it turns out that the thought of creating a visual representation of the monsters was actually seriously considered for a time, and even filmed at one point.

According to Bloody Disgusting, screenwriter Eric Heisserer reported that at one point, upon the insistence of a producer, they scripted a nightmare sequence during which Malorie sees a creature in the house. The problem? It's difficult to create a visual of something that is so scary it literally causes characters to kill themselves when they see it. Instead, when the monster was brought onto the set, it prompted laughter from Bullock, who later described as "a green man with a horrific baby face." Hardly the stuff of suicide-inducing nightmares. They wisely dropped the idea altogether before release. As director Bier added, "Whatever those beings are, they tap into your deepest fear. Everybody's deepest fear is going to be different from the other person. I think to suddenly take upon a concrete shape in order to illustrate that becomes weak."

"Bird Box" sculptor Andy Bergholtz later shared images of the creature as a work in progress, and... well, it's probably for the best that the scene in question stayed on the cutting room floor.

As is the case with any popular movie, "Bird Box" has faced criticism over certain elements and messages that the movie seemed to embrace or at the least turn a blind eye to. In this case, the number one contenders were mental illness and suicide, which were at least appropriate topics of discussion in the sense that both played instrumental roles in the storyline.

That said, the reactions were numerous and varied, with many accusing the movie of reflecting poorly on suicide and its true motivations. Others condemned the representation of mental illness — anyone suffering from a serious mental disorder in the film didn't kill themselves but rather became "agents of evil," trolling around and making people look at the creatures. Often these characters came from asylums or prisons, further stereotyping the antagonists. However, others have argued that the film actually serves as a vehicle to promote awareness for mental illnesses and suicide, highlighting the fact that both can strike suddenly, even when someone seems to be doing fine.

If you or anyone you know is having suicidal thoughts, please call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline by dialing 988 or by calling 1-800-273-TALK (8255)​.

"Bird Box" is pretty scary, with a menagerie of different moments that keep you on the edge of your seat. So it may come as a bit of a surprise to discover that neither Sandra Bullock nor Sarah Paulson are fans of being scared in the first place. And we don't mean that in an "aww, that's cute" sort of way. They've actually been vocal — and fairly serious — about the topic in interviews.

Case in point: When the two co-stars, who are best buds behind the camera, were interviewed by People, they made it clear that they "didn't enjoy feeling fear while on set." The two also launched into a critique of Ellen DeGeneres' habit of purposefully trying to scare them —  especially Paulson — whenever they went on her show. Laughs aside, both Bullock and Paulson's performances in "Bird Box" become that much more impressive when one considers that throughout the project they were battling real-life discomfort along while avoiding the movie's fictional monsters.

From Christian Bale's shocking transformation between "The Machinist" and "The Dark Knight" to Colin Firth's preparation for "The King's Speech," the way an actor goes about getting physically, mentally, and emotionally "in shape" for a role can be fascinating, and "Bird Box" is no exception. Bullock was intensely committed to the role, as evidenced by her intense preparation for the time her character spends blindfolded in an effort to avoid seeing the creatures.

According to director Susanne Bier, Bullock spent time with a blind man who specializes in teaching other blind people to navigate. He helped her understand that sound acts differently in various spaces, helping teach her to find her way around without her eyes. Bullock's commitment hurt — at one point, her blindfold led her into an encounter with a camera that drew blood. But while she may have been committed to the role regardless of her own security, Bullock's passion for authenticity did give way when it came to the safety of others. She had the blindfold reduced to a single layer of thickness whenever she had to carry her onscreen kids through a scene.

While Sandra Bullock trained to be able to move without sight in "Bird Box," she purposefully didn't prepare for another aspect of her character's journey. For a movie where she would be spending a significant amount of the time floating in a pretty small boat on a rather large river, Bullock's experience as a skipper was literally nil the first time she stepped into the boat.

It was a very deliberate choice. Bullock considered the story carefully and decided to use her aquatic ignorance in her favor, insisting that the river scenes be filmed in chronological order so her rowing could look better as the movie progressed — precisely as it would look in the case of the equally inexperienced Malorie if the scenario were real. While method acting stories can sometimes sound pretty silly, in this case, it's hard to argue with Bullock's rationale — or the end result.

At the end of the film's first week of availability, the Netflix Twitter account posted a tweet boasting that "Bird Box" had already been watched by an impressive 45 million accounts, giving it the "best first 7 days ever for a Netflix film!"

While that's a milestone worth celebrating, many news outlets were quick to criticize the figure as less meaningful than it seemed. For more than one pundit, Netflix's tight control of its viewership numbers has made any stat shared by the company less trustworthy than the Nielsen ratings used as a benchmark for cable and broadcast networks. Did 45 million people really stream "Bird Box" in its first week? Maybe not, but the buzz makes it easy to believe that everyone and their mother was watching this thing over the 2018 holiday break.

For a movie filled with so much fear, gore, and dreadful anticipation, "Bird Box" had a bit of an odd impact with the online community, which manifested in the form of a collection of humorous memes. It didn't take long after the movie's release before a series of hysterical memes started popping up all over the interweb showcasing a plethora of different reactions, opinions, and parodies from various elements of the movie.

Some fans simply posted pictures of themselves with their eyes shielded by various coverings. Others shared sequences of people going bananas in slapstick ways, indicating that they'd "opened their eyes." One showed a nervous kid with the subtitle "me after watching bird box, and the leaves start swirling." And an endless procession of others made fun of the driving "dark" scene, Gary's museum of artwork, and everyone's favorite cold-hearted jerk Douglas, just to name a few. Needless to say, they're a welcome relief if you've just finished the movie and need something to help lighten the mood.

Funny memes aside, the other internet phenomenon that the movie spawned was dubbed "the 'Bird Box' challenge," which involved people posting videos of themselves doing things blindfolded.

It only took a matter of days before some of the challenge videos got dangerous. One featured a dad literally running his kid into a wall in an attempt to recreate a scene from the film. It didn't take long for Netflix to issue a statement warning, "Can't believe I have to say this, but: PLEASE DO NOT HURT YOURSELVES WITH THIS BIRD BOX CHALLENGE. We don't know how this started, and we appreciate the love, but Boy and Girl have just one wish for 2019 and it is that you not end up in the hospital due to memes." It's almost enough to make eating detergent look safe and sane by comparison.

Many of the little details and loose ends of "Bird Box" were discussed as viewers digested the experience. For example, there's the shotgun that Douglas was struggling with when Gary tackled him through the railing somehow magically worked again once Tom got it in his hands. Or what about the fact that the birds were in a box tied around Girl's neck when she plunged into the rapids ... but were fine just a few minutes later when they reached the shore.

There are always ways to minimize and excuse the little continuity errors away. But one question was quickly answered in the form of an Easter egg of sorts, albeit a gruesome one. If you wondered what happened to the couple that left the house in search of their children immediately after Malorie arrived, it turns out that they were the corpses the group accidentally ran over while driving to the supermarket. Gross? Yes. But at least we have some closure there, which is more than we can say about the fate of Lucy and Felix.

"Bird Box" may be one of Netflix's most successful movies of all time, but that doesn't mean signing on to the film was an obvious choice for the cast and crew. "Bird Box" had been in the making for many years before Netflix got involved. In fact, Danish director Susanne Bier had read the script seven years before she would go on to make the movie, having initially passed on the project. "Bird Box" star Sandra Bullock also passed on the film the first time it came across her desk. 

Bier told Variety that what inspired her to eventually helm the project was the way the world had changed in the interim. The political and social environment were significantly different since Bier first read the script, she explained. "It feels more relevant now; it feels like a more dystopian point in time," she said in 2018. 

In addition to the relevance of the dystopian atmosphere, Bier felt drawn to how the book and the script portrayed motherhood. "There are a lot of things that are part of our idealized vision of motherhood, but I always thought it was much more complex, much more ferocious," she explained. Bier went on to describe how Bullock was brilliantly able to transmit that maternal ferocity, despite the fact that she's blindfolded for most of the film's runtime. Considering the film's enormous success, it's obvious now that Bier and Bullock's decision to pass on the movie until the time was right was the correct one. 

Filmmaking is a long and arduous process, and sometimes, there are certain tricks that filmmakers use to cut costs and make things a little easier. One of these tricks is the use of stock footage. When a film or television show needs a shot of something they don't have the means to capture themselves — say, a sequence depicting space or the night sky, for example — filmmakers often turn to stock footage companies. Even large Hollywood productions use this method, including the producers behind Netflix's "Bird Box." However, this can occasionally backfire in a major way.

"Bird Box" was released in December 2018, and the following January, a pretty serious controversy broke out over the film's use of stock footage. One sequence in the film included real-life footage of the 2013 Lac-Mégantic rail disaster, a horrific accident wherein 47 people were killed after a train carrying oil exploded in Québec. Canadian politicians called the inclusion of the footage insensitive, but Netflix initially remained silent on the issue. However, in March 2019, Netflix eventually made the decision to remove the offending footage, reported Entertainment Weekly. "We're sorry for any pain caused to the Lac-Mégantic community," a Netflix spokesperson said in response to the controversy.

It's not often that two films both featuring the same two stars get released in the same year, but that's exactly what happened in 2018, which saw "Ocean's 8" and "Bird Box" hit theaters. In case you hadn't already figured it out, both of those movies star Sandra Bullock and Sarah Paulson, with "Ocean's 8" marking the first time the pair had ever worked together. 

For Bullock and director Susanne Bier, the choice for who should play Bullock's sister in the film was obvious. According to People, Bier told Bullock, "It has to be someone who you will miss terribly and you can see in a very short time that you're sisters." When Bier later called up Bullock and suggested Paulson, Bullock replied that was exactly who she had in mind as well. 

Though they'd only worked together for the first time just recently, Bullock said, "It just felt like there was a shorthand that was there by the time that we met for the first time." Paulson said that the challenge of that relationship was making it seem like the two women had spent a lifetime together before the cameras started rolling. Though they didn't have that deep history with one another, their instant connection really showed on the screen. As Paulson put it, "I think the goal is to make it somewhat believable that we had you know, a lifetime of sisterhood, which we don't and we didn't, but we had really bonded from that last 'picture,' as they used to call it in olden times."

Considering the wild popularity of the first film, it's no surprise that viewers have been asking about the possibility of a second "Bird Box" film. The end of the movie revealed a thriving community we hadn't known existed, leading some fans to wonder if we ever might return to that world. 

If you've been wondering this yourself, we have good news to report: A "Bird Box" sequel is currently in development at Netflix. Following the success of the first film, author Josh Malerman, who wrote the book on which the film is based, was inspired to write a sequel. "Malorie" (the name of Bullock's character) was first published in July 2020, and it picks up where the film ended, though much of the book takes place 12 years after the events of the film. 

"'Malorie' opens at the school for the blind, which is where the movie ends," Malerman told Inverse. "Then it jumps a few years later, and it really takes off 10 years after that." Though Malerman was inspired to write the book because of the success of the film adaptation, it didn't change his writing approach. He said that even before he knew the first book would become a movie, he saw the story cinematically. Hopefully, we'll get to see "Malorie" cinematically too, with the horror playing out on our screens.